You’ve Built the Assets
But Haven’t Tested the Income

Approaching retirement with strong savings is one thing. Knowing how those assets will actually produce income under pressure is something else entirely.

Case Study · Approaching Retirement

The Savings Were There. The Plan for Using Them Was Not.

Susan and Steve had done everything right for decades. The question they had never answered was how it would all work together once income stopped.

WEALTHSPAN REVIEW WHAT BECAME VISIBLE COORDINATION PLAN WHAT CHANGED LONGEVITY CIRCLE
Recognition

This situation is common among professionals who have saved and invested responsibly for decades but have never had to answer the question: how will all of this actually work together once income stops?

Susan and Steve were not behind. They had never needed to test what they had built.

Their Position
Ages
54 and 56
Status
Married, two adult children
Family
One child in college, one in graduate school
Home
Almost paid off
Assets
401(k)s, IRAs, and taxable accounts
Timeline
Targeting retirement within five years

Their balance sheet reflected discipline. It had not yet been evaluated under withdrawal pressure.

Problem Reframe

Saving for retirement and knowing how to use those savings are not the same thing.

For decades, the job was straightforward: earn, save, invest, grow.

But when income stops, the job changes. Now those accounts need to produce income, manage taxes, cover healthcare, and last for decades.

The decisions that were once separate begin affecting each other. And the order in which they are made starts to matter more than the amounts.

What the Wealthspan Review Revealed

Nothing was broken. But several things were unconnected.

When Mark sat down with Susan and Steve, their financial picture took shape on one page for the first time. What became visible was not a problem. It was a set of decisions that had never been evaluated together.

No plan for which accounts to draw from first or in what order
Most of their savings had never been taxed, creating future tax pressure they had not measured
No Roth conversion strategy to manage that tax pressure while rates were lower
Healthcare costs before Medicare were not part of the income picture
Social Security timing had not been evaluated against other income decisions
Investments were still positioned for growth, not for producing income under changing conditions

None of these were mistakes. They were decisions that had never needed to work together before.

Important Distinction

Retirement readiness and retirement coordination are not the same thing.

Without coordination
Accounts function independently
Withdrawals are reactive
Taxes accumulate over time
Early market losses reduce future income capacity
Decisions are made in isolation
With coordination
Accounts are sequenced intentionally
Income is structured in advance
Tax exposure is managed across decades
Risk is addressed before it matters
Decisions are evaluated as part of a system
What They Wanted to Know

They were not looking for higher returns. They were looking for answers.

01
What is the earliest date we can retire, and what does that require?
02
Which accounts should we draw from first, and in what order?
03
How do we manage the tax bill that is building inside our retirement accounts?
04
How do healthcare costs before Medicare fit into the income picture?
05
Are our estate documents aligned with how the money will actually flow?
06
How do we replace uncertainty with a clear picture we can act on?
How the Engagement Worked

Over 30 days, their financial picture went from a collection of accounts to a coordinated plan.

After the Wealthspan Review, Susan and Steve decided to move forward. Over the next four weeks, Mark led two planning meetings where every decision was evaluated not on its own, but against how it affected income, taxes, and flexibility over time.

The withdrawal order affected their tax exposure. The tax strategy affected how long the portfolio could last. Healthcare costs changed what income they actually needed. Everything connected.

What the Plan Addressed

The work was not to add complexity. It was to connect what they already had.

01
When could they retire, and what would that require?

Modeled multiple retirement dates under different market conditions and spending levels. Tested what happens in a bad market during the first years of retirement, not just the average scenario.

02
Which accounts to draw from first, and why

Designed the order they would take money from taxable, tax-deferred, and tax-free accounts. Integrated Roth conversion timing and Social Security decisions into one coordinated sequence.

03
Repositioning investments for income, not just growth

Shifted their portfolio to reflect the reality that they would soon be drawing from it rather than adding to it. Managed the risk that a market drop in the first years of retirement could permanently reduce their income.

04
Healthcare costs built into the income plan

Modeled coverage costs before Medicare and incorporated long-term healthcare expenses directly into how much income they would need. Healthcare was treated as a known cost, not a surprise.

05
Estate documents aligned with how the money would actually flow

Updated beneficiary designations, powers of attorney, and estate documents so they matched the new income and distribution plan rather than the accumulation structure they had outgrown.

What Changed

For the first time, Susan and Steve could see how everything worked together.

They knew the earliest date they could retire and what that required
They had a clear order for which accounts to draw from and when
Their future tax exposure was measured and a Roth conversion strategy was in place
Healthcare costs were part of the income plan, not a separate worry
Their investments were aligned with how and when the money would be used
The Longevity Circle

The plan was in place. Now it needs to stay aligned.

After the 30-day engagement, Susan and Steve transitioned into the Longevity Circle: three meetings per year designed to keep their financial decisions coordinated as life changes.

Annual Review (Q1)
Full picture review, updated projections, goals re-examined
Mid-Year + Year-End
Focused check-ins on the areas needing the most attention, plus forward-looking decisions before the new year

The decisions Susan and Steve make in the first years of retirement will shape everything that follows.

The Longevity Circle exists to make sure those decisions stay coordinated as circumstances change.

30 days from start to plan. Then ongoing partnership for as long as they need it.
Does This Sound Familiar?

This situation is common among people who:

Are within 5 to 10 years of retirement and starting to think about timing
Have saved across multiple accounts but have not designed how income will come from them
Are uncertain how taxes, Social Security, withdrawals, and healthcare costs will interact
Want to see how everything works together before making decisions that are difficult to reverse
Where It Started

Susan and Steve did not need more products or more accounts.

They needed to see how everything they had already built would work together when income stopped. That is what the Wealthspan Review was designed to show them.

The First Step

See how your decisions fit together

The Wealthspan Review is a 45-minute conversation with Mark Sweeney where your financial picture takes shape on one page. No preparation required. No obligation.

If you decide to move forward, your plan is typically in place within 30 days.

Start with a Wealthspan Review™

You will hear from Khy within one business day.
No pressure. No obligation.

This is a hypothetical situation based on real life examples. Names and circumstances have been changed. The opinions voiced in this material are for general information only and are not intended to provide specific advice or recommendations for any individual. To determine which investments or strategies may be appropriate for you, consult your advisor prior to investing. There is no guarantee that a diversified portfolio will enhance overall returns or outperform a non-diversified portfolio. Diversification does not protect against market risk.